Method, system, apparatus and device for data exchange

ABSTRACT

According to embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided a method, system, apparatus, electronic device, storage medium and program product for data exchange. The method described herein comprises: obtaining original data to be exchanged by a target application between a first platform and a second platform; obtaining normalized data corresponding to a type of the original data by processing the original data based on the type; determining a satisfaction of a data exchange constraint from the normalized data. In this way, the embodiments of the present disclosure may simplify and promote the determination of the data exchange constraint and accelerate the data exchange process.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is based on and claims the priority to the Chinesepatent application No. 202111256545.5, filed on Oct. 27, 2021, thedisclosure of which is incorporated into the present application byreference in its entirety.

FIELD

Various implementations of the present disclosure relate to the computerfield, and more specifically, to method, system, apparatus, device,computer-readable storage medium and computer program product for dataexchange.

BACKGROUND

With the development of Internet technology, different varieties ofInternet applications have become an important part of people's life.Such applications generate a huge amount of data each day, which bringsabout various data security issues such as data sovereignty protection.For example, some countries might prohibit specific types of user datafrom being sent to overseas servers.

For some globalized applications, such challenges are even moresignificant. These globalized applications may need to provide servicesfor users in multiple different regions based on same technicalarchitecture. However, these regions might have different data securityconstraints, for example, specific data sovereignty protectionrequirements, which further compound the difficulty of data securityprotection.

SUMMARY

In a first aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a methodfor data exchange. The method comprises: obtaining original data to beexchanged by a target application between a first platform and a secondplatform; obtaining normalized data corresponding to a type of theoriginal data by processing the original data based on the type;determining a satisfaction of a data exchange constraint from thenormalized data.

In a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a dataexchange system. The data exchange system comprises: a first data centerconfigured to obtain original data to be exchanged by a targetapplication between a first platform and a second platform and obtainnormalized data corresponding to a type of the original data byprocessing the original data based on the type; and a second data centerconfigured to obtain the normalized data from the first data center anddetermine a satisfaction of a data exchange constraint from thenormalized data.

In a third aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided anapparatus for data exchange. The apparatus comprises: an obtainingmodule configured to obtain original data to be exchanged by a targetapplication between a first platform and a second platform; apre-processing module configured to obtain normalized data correspondingto a type of the original data by processing the original data based onthe type; and a constraint satisfaction determining module configured todetermine a satisfaction of a data exchange constraint from thenormalized data.

In a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided anelectronic device. The device comprises: a memory and a processor;wherein the memory is used to store one or more computer instructions,wherein the one or more computer instructions are executed by theprocessor to implement a method according to the first aspect of thepresent disclosure.

In a fifth aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided acomputer-readable storage medium, with one or more computer instructionsstored thereon, wherein the one or more computer instructions areexecuted by a processor to implement a method according to the firstaspect of the present disclosure.

In a sixth aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided acomputer program product, comprising one or more computer instructions,wherein the one or more computer instructions are executed by aprocessor to implement a method according to the first aspect of thepresent disclosure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other features, advantages and aspects of the embodimentsof the present disclosure will become more apparent with reference tothe following detailed descriptions in conjunction with the accompanyingdrawings. In the drawings, the same or similar reference numerals denotethe same or similar elements, wherein:

FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a data security protectionsystem according to the embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of a computing securitysub-system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3A shows an example deployment environment in which a data exchangesub-system is deployed according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3B shows an implementation of DES in an internal data center (IDC)at the TTP side and an overseas IDC (RoW (rest of World) IDC) wherenon-TTP is located according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3C shows a block diagram of example architecture of DE according tosome embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3D shows a flowchart of a data exchange process according to someembodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3E shows a flowchart of an example data flow of various dataprocessing implemented as DES according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure;

FIG. 3F shows a schematic block diagram of data exchange architecturerelating to an MQ channel according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3G shows a schematic block diagram of data exchange architecturerelating to an HDFS channel according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3H shows a schematic view of a target object storage (TOS) channelfor copying data from TTP IDC to RoW IDC according to some embodimentsof the present disclosure;

FIG. 3I shows a schematic view of a TOS channel for copying data fromRoW IDC to TTP IDC according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3J shows a message sequence diagram in a TOS channel according tosome embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3K shows a schematic block diagram of data exchange architecturerelating to a service invocation channel according to some embodimentsof the present disclosure;

FIG. 3L shows an example of data exchange from non-TTP to TTP in aservice invocation channel according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3M shows an example of data exchange from TTP to non-TTP in aservice invocation channel according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 4A shows a flowchart of a method of managing traffic data of amobile end application according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 4B shows a schematic view of an analysis and restriction processfor traffic data of native type according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure;

FIG. 4C shows a schematic view of an analysis and restriction processfor traffic data of Web View type according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure;

FIG. 4D shows a schematic view of an analysis and restriction processfor traffic data of third-party SDK type according to some embodimentsof the present disclosure;

FIG. 4E shows a module diagram of a security sandbox sub-systemaccording to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of an example process of managing arecommendation policy according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 6 shows an example block diagram of an apparatus for data exchangeaccording to some embodiments of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of an example device for implementing theembodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The embodiments will be described in more detail with reference to theaccompanying drawings, in which some embodiments of the presentdisclosure have been illustrated. However, the present disclosure can beimplemented in various manners, and thus should not be construed to belimited to embodiments disclosed herein. On the contrary, thoseembodiments are provided for the thorough and complete understanding ofthe present disclosure, and completely conveying the scope of thepresent disclosure to those skilled in the art. It is to be understoodthat the drawings and embodiments of the present disclosure are onlyused for illustration, rather than limiting the protection scope of thepresent disclosure.

In the description of the embodiments of the present disclosure, theterms “comprise” and its variants used herein are to be read as openterms that mean “include, but is not limited to.” The term “based on” isto be read as “based at least in part on”. The term “one embodiment” or“the embodiment” is to be read as “at least one embodiment.” The terms“first,” “second” and the like may refer to different or the sameobjects. Other definitions, explicit and implicit, might be includedbelow.

The basic principle and several example implementations of the presentdisclosure will be illustrated with reference to the accompanyingdrawings.

Overall Architecture of Data Security Protection System

According to the embodiments of the present disclosure, a data securityprotection system is provided. FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram ofa data security protection system 1000 according to the embodiments ofthe present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 1, the data security protectionsystem 1000 comprises a plurality of sub-systems for protecting, fromdifferent dimensions, security of relevant data generated during using atarget application by a user.

Generally speaking, to support the operation of the target application,on one hand, the user needs to operate the target application 1080, forexample, through an appropriate electronic device. On the other hand, atarget application platform 1030 needs to be deployed in an appropriatecomputing environment (e.g., cloud computing environment), to operatevarious types of services for supporting the normal operation of thetarget application 1080.

In some embodiments, the data security protection system 1000 may firstguarantee the security of data generated during the operation of thetarget application 1080 from the perspective of the security ofoperating codes. As shown in FIG. 1, the data security protection system1000 may comprise a security computing sub-system 1060, which may beused to guarantee the security of codes corresponding to the targetapplication 1080 and guarantee the security of codes corresponding tothe target application platform 1030.

A service operating file compiled by the computing sub-system 1060 maybe deployed to the target application platform 1030, for example, and aninstallation file (e.g., apk file) of the target application compiled bythe computing sub-system 1060 may be issued to an application store1120, for example. The specific implementation of the security computingsub-system 1060 will be discussed in detail below in conjunction withFIG. 2.

In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 1, the security computingsub-system 1060 may be based on cloud infrastructure 1070. In someembodiments, the cloud infrastructure 1070 may be provided by a trustedpartner, for example. In the present disclosure, the “trusted partner”may also be referred to as trusted technology partner (TTP), which maycomprise, for example, any technically trusted individual, enterprise ororganization in a specific region (e.g., specific country orjurisdiction).

In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 1, the data security protectionsystem 1000 may comprise a trusted security environment 1010 provided byTTP. Unlike the deployment of a traditional application platform, thetarget application platform 1030 may be deployed in the trusted securityenvironment 1010 to increase the security of data generated by thetarget application platform 1030 as well as the transparency andcredibility of the operating mechanism thereof.

In some embodiments, the target application 1080 may provide users withcontent recommendation services through recommendation algorithms. Suchcontent recommendation may comprise but not limited to, multimediacontent recommendation, user recommendation, product recommendation,etc. Considering that more and more recommendation systems currently usemachine learning to perform the recommendation function, it might bedifficult to guarantee the fairness of recommendation by managing therecommendation mechanism only from the code level.

As shown in FIG. 1, the data security protection system 1000 may furthercomprise a recommendation management sub-system 1050, which may, forexample, guarantee the fairness of the recommendation mechanism in thetarget application 1080 by testing the recommendation algorithm operatedby the target application platform 1030. The specific implementation ofthe recommendation management sub-system 1050 will be described indetail below.

In some embodiments, considering that when the target applicationplatform 1030 operates a service to support the normal operation of thetarget application 1080, the target application platform 1030 might needto interact with applications or data centers (also referred to asoverseas applications or overseas data centers) outside the targetregion (e.g., a specific country or jurisdiction) where it is currentlydeployed.

Generally speaking, the target region usually adopts laws or regulationsto constrain the communication of data generated in the present regionwith the abroad. Specific types of data generated in the target regionmight be prohibited from being transmitted abroad. In order to guaranteethe compliance of the target application platform 1030 in thecommunication process with the abroad, the data security protectionsub-system may comprise a data exchange sub-system 1040. Similarly, thedata exchange sub-system 1040 may be deployed in the trusted securityenvironment 1010 to guarantee the transparency and credibility of itsoperation.

In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 1, the data exchange sub-system1040 may comprise a plurality of data channels for different types ofdata transmission. For example, multimedia data generated in the targetapplication platform 1030 may communicate with an overseas application1140 and/or an overseas data center 1150 through a respective datachannel in the data exchange sub-system 1040 via a content distributionnetwork 1130 provided by a third party.

As another example, for some specific internal data generated in thetarget application platform 1030, it may communicate with the overseasdata center 1150 and an overseas development department 1160 through arespective data channel, e.g., through a direct optical cable. Thespecific implementation of the data exchange sub-system 1040 will bedescribed in detail in conjunction with FIGS. 3A to 3M.

Further, to guarantee the security of outbound and inbound communicationof the target application platform 1030, in some embodiments, the datasecurity sub-system 1000 may further comprise an application firewallsub-system 1020. The application firewall sub-system 1020 may bedeployed in the trusted security environment 1010, which may be used tomonitor the data communication from the target application 1080 to thetarget application platform 1030, the data communication from the targetapplication platform 1030 to the target application 1080, and/or thedata communication from the target application platform 1030 to athird-party application 110, etc.

In this way, the data security protection platform 1000 not only mayguarantee the security and compliance of data communication between thetarget application platform 1030 and the abroad through the dataexchange sub-system 1040, but also can guarantee the security andcompliance of communication between the target application platform 1030and various domestic objects (e.g., the target application 1080 or athird-party application 1110, etc.) through the application firewallsub-system 1020.

In some embodiments, regarding the target application 1080, to guaranteethe compliance and credibility of its operation, the data securityprotection system 1000 may further comprise a security sandboxsub-system 1090 managed by the TTP, which enables different types ofnetwork communication involved in the application business logic 1100 ofthe target application 1080 to be protected by the security sandboxsub-system 1090. In this way, the data security protection system 1000may prevent the target application 1080 from initiating non-compliantdata communication, e.g., through backdoor programs. The detailedimplementation of the security sandbox sub-system 1090 will be describedin conjunction with FIGS. 4A to 4E below.

Thus, based on the data security protection system 1000 of the presentdisclosure, TTP can manage and monitor various aspects such as codesecurity and data security during the entire life cycle from thedevelopment to operation of the target application, thereby guaranteeingthe data security associated with the target application and alsoguaranteeing the compliance of its operation.

Security Computing Sub-System

The security computing sub-system 1060 will be described in detail belowwith reference to FIG. 2. FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of thesecurity computing sub-system 1060 according to the embodiments of thepresent disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 2, the security computing sub-system 1060 may comprise,for example, a security code environment 2010, which may be provided byTTP. The working process of the security computing sub-system 1060 willbe described in conjunction with the submission of new developed code2140.

As shown in FIG. 2, when developers need to deploy the new developedcode 2140, they may submit the developed code 2140 to the security codeenvironment 2010 through a synchronization gateway 2150 provided by TTP.Accordingly, the developed code 2140 will be synchronized to a codelibrary 2160 in the security code environment 2010.

In some embodiments, when developers need to use the new developed code2140 for compiling, the developer may send a build request to anartifact building system 2080 through the synchronization gateway 2150.

Alternatively, when the code library 2160 receives the new developedcode 2140, the code library 2160 may also automatically send a codemerge event to the artifact building system 2080 to trigger the artifactbuilding system 2080 to start the artifact (e.g., executable code)building process.

When the building process is started, a code pulling module 2090 mayobtain a code file for building from the code library 2160. In someembodiments, the code file for building may be specified by developersor automatically determined by the artifact building system 2080.

Further, a compiling module 2100 may compile code pulled from the codelibrary 2160 by the code pulling module 2090, for example, to compile itinto intermediate code.

In some embodiments, considering that some third-party code is usuallyintroduced during the code compiling process, the security computingsub-system 1060 also need to guarantee the security of introducedthird-party code.

As shown in FIG. 2, the security computing sub-system 1060 may comprisea third-party independent gateway 2030 for checking and confirming thesecurity of a third-party library 2020 required to be introduced. It isto be understood that such a third-party library might be a compiledlink library or source code itself, for example.

The third-party library 2020 passing the security check may be added toan artifact library 2040. As shown in FIG. 2, during the artifactbuilding process, the compiling module 2100 may obtain, from theartifact library 2040, other artifact on which a current artifact to becompiled depends, e.g., a historically compiled artifact or an artifactgenerated based on the third-party library 2020.

Further, the compiling module 2100 may compile the code pulled from thecode library 2160 and the artifact obtained from the artifact library2040 to generate intermediate code, so that a security code scanningmodule 2110 may perform code security checks.

It is to be understood that the security code scanning module 2110managed by TTP may perform any suitable code scanning process forsecurity checks. Such scanning rules are unknown to developers, so thatthe security of code compiled for final artifacts may be guaranteed.

In some embodiments, an uploading module 2120 may perform respectiveuploads according to a result of the security code scanning module 2110.If the security code scanning module 2110 determines that theintermediate code obtained from the compilation is secure, then theuploading module 2120 may upload an executable file obtained from thecompilation to the artifact library 2040.

Further, if the security code scanning module 2110 determines that theintermediate code obtained from the compilation is secure, the uploadingmodule 2120 may upload signature information of the executable file toan artifact signature management module 2060.

On the contrary, if the security code scanning module 2110 determinesthat there are respective risks in the current intermediate code, thenthe uploading module 2120 may upload corresponding risks to a problemtracking system 2070 to form a risk analysis report.

Accordingly, the executable file obtained from the compilation may beprohibited from being uploaded to the artifact library 2040.

In some embodiments, the developed code 2140 in the code library 2160may be provided in a trusted environment for manual check. If it isdetermined that there are risks in the developed code 2140, then theresult may also be reported to the problem tracking system 2070.

In some embodiments, if the security code scanning module 2110determines that there are respective risks in the current intermediatecode, then the uploading module 2120 may notify a callback module 2130to mark the respective code in the code library 2160 as risk code.

In some embodiments, the problem tracking system 2070 maintained by TTPmay send the received risk report information to developers ormaintainers of the developed code 2140 to remind that the currentdeveloped code 2140 cannot pass the security check and thus cannot bedeployed.

In some embodiments, if the developed code 2140 passes the securitycheck, it may be compiled into an executable file and further added tothe artifact library 2040 to be deployed via a deployment gateway 2050.

In some embodiments, before deploying the artifact (i.e., the executablefile) obtained from the artifact library 2040, the deployment gateway2050 may verify through the artifact signature management system 2060whether the signature of the artifact is valid. After the validity ofthe artifact's signature is confirmed, the deployment gateway 2050 maydeploy the artifact generated based on the developed code 2140 to thenetwork.

In some embodiments, the artifact may be an application program executedat a client device, and then the deployment gateway 2050 may issue agenerated installation file (e.g., apk file) to a respective applicationstore to be downloaded by users. Thereby, the embodiments of the presentdisclosure may guarantee that installation files which can be downloadedand installed by users are always issued by the security codeenvironment 2010 via the deployment gateway 2050.

In some embodiments, the artifact may be a service program to bedeployed into the target application platform 1030, for exampleSpecifically, the maintainer of the target application might initiate arequest for deploying a specific artifact to the target applicationplatform 1030 to the deployment platform. Accordingly, after the requestis approved, the target application platform 1030 may obtain from theartifact library 2040 the specific artifact to be deployed andauthenticate the signature of the specific artifact. After the signatureof the artifact passes the authentication, the artifact may be deployedto the target application platform 1030 through a virtual machine orcontainer, for example.

Thereby, based on the discussed security computing sub-system, theembodiments of the present disclosure can effectively monitor theprocess of translating code into an application program or serviceprogram which will be deployed and used, from various cycles such ascode uploading, code writing, code compiling and third-party libraryreferencing. In this way, the embodiments of the present disclosure caneffectively avoid various security vulnerabilities or compliance risksintroduced in the source code.

Data Exchange Sub-System

The operation of applications involves data interaction betweenapplication platforms under the jurisdiction of different countries andregions. For example, in the example shown in FIG. 1, it is desirable tointeract data between the target application platform 1030 and a targetapplication platform where the same application is operating abroad, toprovide the global data interaction of the application. As describedabove, the data exchange sub-system (DES) 1040 may support thesynchronization of public data of the target application and other datathat meets rules between different platforms and guarantee the securityand compliance of data being exchanged. In general, the DES 1040 isconfigured to detect whether data between different platforms meets adata exchange constraint. Data exchange constraints may compriseconstraints which are set to meet national or regional laws andregulations, and constraints which are set due to the requirements ofenterprises, organizations, and/or other aspects of user protection,etc.

For example, in countries or regions with specific data sovereigntyprotection requirements, TTP may be required to conduct inspectionsinvolving data sovereignty protection. Therefore, in many casesinvolving cross-platform data exchange, it is necessary to protect thesecurity and compliance of data exchange. In particular, after the TTPcomputer room is set up, the data exchange between the outside and theTTP computer room will be restricted, and it is hoped that datainteracted with the TTP party will be checked by the data sovereigntyprotection. In such examples, the data exchange constraint may compriserules related to data sovereignty protection requirements of specificcountries or regions.

Such interactive data may be divided into two aspects. One aspectincludes intercommunication data between platforms, and the otherincludes operation and maintenance data such as access to or operationof a platform by the operation and maintenance staff of the platform.The intercommunication data is mainly used for synchronization betweentwo platforms to guarantee the functional integrity of applications, andsuch data needs to go through the DES system for security and compliancechecks. The intercommunication data includes, for example, onlinebusiness data, offline data, etc. The check of operation and maintenancedata is to guarantee that the operations of the operation andmaintenance staff at the operation and maintenance control plane arealso compliant.

FIG. 3A shows an example deployment environment 3001 where a DES 1040 isdeployed according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

In FIG. 3A, a TTP party 3027 refers to an environment that needs the TTPsupervision and constraint in a specific country or region. The TTPparty 3027 may involve various components for operating, managing andmaintaining a target application, for example, including a businesssystem 3028, an operation platform 3029, an online storage 3030, anoffline storage 3031, etc. The TTP party 3028 further comprises anoperation and maintenance platform 3032, and the operation andmaintenance staff needs to access the operation and maintenance platform3032 to realize the access to, management or maintenance of the targetapplication.

Similarly, a non-TTP party 3020 refers to an environment to which one ormore other countries or regions other than the specific country orregion belong, which is free of the data exchange constraint of thecountry or region where the TTP party 3027 is located. The non-TTP party3020 may involve various components for operating, managing andmaintaining a target application, for example, including a businesssystem 3020, an operation platform 3021, an online storage 3022, anoffline storage 3023, etc. The non-TTP party 3020 further comprises anoperation and maintenance platform 3024, and the operation andmaintenance staff needs to access the operation and maintenance platform3024 to realize the access to, management or maintenance of a localapplication or application platform.

The domestic user traffic will flow through some components of the TTPparty 3027, and the overseas user traffic will flow through somecomponents of the non-TTP party 3020. As used herein, the “domestic usertraffic” refers to the user traffic generated on application platformsunder the jurisdiction of the specific country or region, and the“overseas user traffic” refers to the user traffic generated onapplication platforms under the jurisdiction of one or more othercountries or regions other than the specific country or region.

In the environment of FIG. 3A, the intercommunication data comprises thedomestic user traffic and overseas user traffic interacted between theTTP party and the non-TTP party. The intercommunication data will gothrough the DES 1040 for checks in aspects of data security, complianceand the like. In addition, an operational gateway 3026 may further beset, to perform data security and compliance checks on the operation andmaintenance data.

As to be discussed in detail below, in the DES 1040, different datachannels may be set according to the type of data to check theto-be-exchanged data in a respective channel FIG. 3A schematically showssome channels, including a target object storage (TOS) channel, amessage queue (MQ) channel, an offline aggregated data channel, a logchannel, a service invocation channel, etc.

For both parties of data exchange, they may have their own DESes toachieve data protection, for example, for protecting incoming dataand/or outgoing data.

FIG. 3B further shows the implementation of the DES 1040 in the internaldata center (IDC) of the TTP party and the RoW internal data center (RoWIDC) where the non-TTP is located.

In FIG. 3B, a TTP IDC 3056 refers to an IDC of the target applicationoperating in the specific country or region, which is under the dataprotection testing of the TTP. An overseas IDC 3059 refers to an IDC ofthe target application operating in one or more other countries orregions other than the specific country or region, which might besubject to the data protection constraint of other countries or regions.

As shown in FIG. 3B, a DES 1040A is implemented in the TTP IDC 3056 andused to detect incoming and/or outgoing data. A DES 1040B is implementedin the overseas IDC 3059 and used to detect incoming and/or outgoingdata. Both the DES 1040A and the DES 1040B may be considered as specificdeployment instances of the DES 1040.

From the perspective of the TTP IDC 3056, the incoming or outgoing datamay include various types of data, which will be described withexamples.

As shown in FIG. 3B, for the TTP IDC 3056, the outside incoming data mayinclude a user request, e.g., a proactive request initiated by a user ina specific country or region through a target application 3058 operatinginside. As to be described in other portions of this specification, insome embodiments, the user request may further go through a firewallgateway 3057 in the TTP IDC 3056 and/or a mobile sandbox for securityprotection. The user request will reach a domestic application platform3041 in the TTP IDC 3056 for further processing. In some example, thedomestic application platform 3041 may comprise various services, vendorgateways, storage and other components. In addition, if the user requestis to be transferred to a data center other than the TTP IDC 3056, theuser request will be delivered to the DES 1040A for data protection.

In some embodiments, for the TTP IDC 3056, the outside incoming data mayfurther comprise a vendor request initiated by a vendor 3055, e.g.,requesting a specific service of a domestic application platform. Forexample, a third-party vendor might invoke an application programinterface (API) of a domestic application platform, e.g., OpenAPI. Sinceit cannot be confirmed whether the third-party vendor is a domesticuser, the vendor request will be sent via a third-party gateway 3040 inthe TTP IDC 3056 to the vendor gateway in the domestic applicationplatform 3041 for check, to determine whether it is a domestic user. Ifthe vendor initiating the request is a domestic user, then the vendorrequest may be responded normally. If the vendor initiating the requestis an overseas user, then the vendor request will go through the DES1040A before being transferred.

In some embodiments, for the TTP IDC 3056, the outside incoming data mayfurther comprise data which is synchronized from the overseas IDC 3059to the TTP IDC 3056. For example, if the incoming data from the abroadneeds the data security audit, the incoming data from the abroad alsoneeds to be processed by the DES 1040A.

In some embodiments, for the TTP IDC 3056, the outside incoming data mayfurther comprise the operation and maintenance operations of the TTP IDC3056 by the operation and maintenance staff, e.g., changes to the TTPIDC 3056. Such operations may include code type changes, configurationtype changes, log maintenance, etc. Code type changes may comprise theinitiation of new functions, the release of bin files, and so on. Codetype changes may be executed by the domestic operation and maintenancestaff of the application platform in the country or region.Configuration type changes may include enabling or disabling somesettings of the target application, scheduling traffic configuration,and so on. In some cases, configuration changes can be performed by theoverseas platform operation and maintenance staff for multinationaloperation application platforms. Of course, this depends on themanagement requirements of different application. Log maintenance refersto maintaining a log 3044 in the TTP IDC 3056.

In some embodiments, the domestic or overseas operation and maintenancestaff may perform operation and maintenance operations on the TTP IDC3056 under conditions of network isolation to further guarantee the datasovereignty protection. As shown in FIG. 3B, the domestic operation andmaintenance staff initiates the operation and maintenance operationunder the network isolation, and the operation and maintenance operationwill be distributed via a load balancer 3045 to be distributed to code3042, an operation and maintenance platform 3043 or the log 3044 in theTTP IDC 3056. Besides the network isolation, the operation andmaintenance operation of the domestic operation and maintenance staffwill further be subject to the security check via the operationalgateway 3046 and then distributed to the code 3042, the operation andmaintenance platform 3043 or the log 3044 in the TTP IDC 3056.

In some embodiments, for the TTP IDC 3056, the inside outgoing data mayinclude a third-party request which is initiated from the domesticapplication platform 3041 during the operation of the applicationplatform, for requesting a third-party service 3054, e.g., a third-partyrequest in a public network. The third-party request also needs the dataprotection by the DES 1040A.

In some embodiments, for the TTP IDC 3056, the inside outgoing data mayfurther comprise data which is synchronized from the TTP IDC 3056 to theoverseas IDC 3059. For example, during the operation of the targetapplication, user contents stored in the TTP IDC 3056 may need to besynchronized to the overseas IDC 3059. According to some regulations onthe data sovereignty protection, such data might be the key data thatDES 1040A needs to review.

In some embodiments, for the TTP IDC 3056, the inside outgoing data mayfurther comprise code synchronization data. For example, in some cases,due to check requirements such as data sovereignty protection, a codereview of the target application or application platform might berequired. In order not to leak the code while meeting the requirementsof data sovereignty protection, the code might be synchronized to asecurity isolation environment 3051 for review. The security isolationenvironment 3051 may be, for example, a physical environment such as acomputer room that is not connected to the Internet, a monitoredcomputer room and the like, or a virtual computing environment withsecurity protection, etc.

From the perspective of the overseas IDC 3059, the DES 1040B deployedtherein may also perform security protection on similar outside incomingdata and inside outgoing data. For example, a user request which isgenerated by the user through the target application 3058 operatingabroad may also be protected by the DES 1040B after reaching an overseasapplication platform 3048 (which may comprise various types of servicesand storage) via the load balancer 3047. In the aspect of operation andmaintenance, the overseas operation and maintenance staff may alsoperform the operation and maintenance operation on the overseasapplication platform 3048 via a crystal gateway 3049 with networkisolation. Such operations of operation and maintenance may be underdata protection via the DES 1040B.

For data being protected in the DES 1040A or 1040B, solutions andprocessing for data sovereignty protection might also differ dependingon different types of the data.

In the embodiments of the present disclosure, in the DES 1040 (e.g., theDES 1040A or 1040B), data may be pre-processed according to the type ofdata to normalized format the data formats, thereby simplifying andfacilitating subsequent inspections on data sovereignty protection andaccelerating the data exchange process.

Thereby, the DES 1040 may be divided into different processing portionsaccording to the type of data. For example, according to the source ofdata, the DES 1040A may comprise a domestic user data channel forprocessing data related to users in a specific country or region; anoverseas user data channel for processing data related to users abroad;an engineering technology data channel for processing engineering,operation and maintenance data, such as code, parameters and otherresearch and development data, operation and maintenance data, etc.Further, data in each channel may further be divided depending onprocessing techniques such as data generation, transmission, receivingand storage. As to be described below, divided by techniques, data indifferent channels may be divided into one or more of message queue (MQ)data, offline aggregated data, target object storage (TOS) data andservice invocation data, or other types of data.

For data passing the data sovereignty protection review, data in thenormalized format may be converted back to data in the original formatand provided to a respective destination. According to the solution ofthe present disclosure, due to different sources of data, differenttypes of data differ in the data format, processing technique and otheraspect. Through the normalized pre-processing and post-processing, thecomplexity in the subsequent review stage of data sovereignty protectionmay be reduced. In addition, with the update of data sources andtechnical expansion/changes, it is possible to only change thepre-processing and post-processing of data, instead of making complexchanges to the processing in the data exchange constraint determiningstage. Therefore, the data exchange architecture has great flexibilityand scalability.

With reference to the accompanying drawings, a detailed description ispresented below to some specific embodiments.

Overall Architecture and Data Flow of DES

FIG. 3C shows a block diagram of example architecture of a DES 1040according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. In the exampleof FIG. 3C, the DES 1040 is shown as synchronizing data between thedomestic application platform 304 and an external application platform(collectively referred to as the overseas application platform 3048) forthe target application and performing a determination of a data exchangeconstraint.

As shown in FIG. 3C, the DES 1040 may comprise a DES adapter 3061, a DEScenter and a DES adapter 3070. The DES center may comprise DES centersfor different types of data channels, e.g., a DES center 3065A fordomestic user data, a DES center 3065B for overseas user data, and a DEScenter 3065C for engineering technology data, etc. The DES centers3065A, 3065B and 3065C have different synchronization abilities. For thesake of description below, the DES centers 3065A, 3065B and 3065C may becollectively referred to as the DES center 3065.

The DES adapter 3061 is connected with the domestic application platform3041 to receive data to be synchronized and detected via the DES 1040from the domestic application platform 3041, send data received from thedomestic application platform 3041 and detected by the DES 1040 to theoverseas application platform 3048, and receive data to be synchronizedand detected by the DES 1040 from the overseas application platform3048. The DES adapters 3061 and 3070 are both interconnected with theDES center 3065 to transfer data to the DES center 3065.

Each DES center 3065 is configured to detect data by using a dataexchange constraint to guarantee the security and compliance of dataexchanged between two application platforms. Usually, data meeting thedata exchange constraint will be delivered to a respective destinationthrough the DES 1040, while data that does not meet the data exchangeconstraint might be rejected by the DES 1040.

The DES adapter 3061 and 3070 may be configured to performpre-processing and post-processing on data to be transferred to the DEScenter 3065, so that the DES center 3065 may determine whether the dataexchange constraint is met based on the normalized data corresponding tovarious data types.

In some embodiments, the DES adapter 3061 and the DES center 3065 in theDES 1040 may be implemented in the TTP IDC 3065 together with thedomestic application platform 3041, and the DES adapter 3070 may beimplemented in the overseas IDC 3059 together with the overseasapplication platform 3048.

In some embodiments, different components in the DES 1040 may beisolated to further guarantee more effective data isolation. Such dataisolation may be implemented by deploying different components indifferent data centers. In some embodiments, data isolation may berealized by applying virtual private data center (VPC) technology. Forexample, as shown in FIG. 3C, the DES adapter 3061 may be implemented inVPC1, and various DES centers may be implemented in VPC2, and the DESadapter 3070 may be implemented in VPC3. The determining of the datasecurity and compliance in the DES center 3065 may be performed by TTP.In the case of data isolation, VPC1 and VPC3 do not have a directcommunication connection between them, while VPC1 and VPC3 each have adirect communication connection with VPC2 and may communicatedata/information. Through the data isolation brought by VPC technology,the DES center 3065 deployed in VPC2 may be an area trusted by TTP(referred to as a TTP-trusted area).

In some embodiments, the DES adapter 3061 may comprise a DES entry 3062,which may perform the control-plane processing, for example, apply forcreating and managing data channels, registration rules, etc. by theoperation and maintenance staff, and may view the data in the channel byTTP. The DES adapter 3061 may further comprise a DES proxy 3063 whichmay perform the data-plane processing, such as data verification, datafiltering, data conversion, data sampling, log detection, etc.Similarly, in some embodiments, the DES adapter 3070 may comprise acontrol-plane DES entry 3072 and a data-plane DES proxy 3073.

In some embodiments, for domestic user data channels, the DES center3065A may comprise a DES registration center for registering dataexchange constraints, configuration data, etc. The DES center 3065A mayfurther comprise refined channels, including service invocation channelsfor service invocation data, MQ channels for MQ data, HDFS channels foroffline aggregated data (where HDFS is referred to as Hadoop distributedfile system), and TOS channels for TOS data. Offline aggregated datacomprises, for example, highly parallel integrated virtual environment(HIVE) type data.

Service invocation data comprises data for remote service invocationsusing various network protocols or invocation protocols, such as HTTPprotocol or RPC protocol. MQ data may comprise data supporting MQprotocol and similar protocol, for example, including data stored invarious databases (e.g., MySQL, Redis database). Offline aggregated datamay comprise data in file systems based on HDFS technology, and data infile systems based on other techniques. TOS data comprises object files,such as video, audio, image, document and other media files.

In some embodiments, although not shown in FIG. 3C, the DES center 3065Bfor overseas user data channels and the DES center 3065C for engineeringtechnology data channels may also comprise components similar to the DEScenter 3065A.

FIG. 3D shows a flowchart of a data exchange process 300 according tosome embodiments of the present disclosure. The process 300 may beimplemented in the DES 1040.

As shown in FIG. 3D, at block 3301, the DES 1040 obtains original datato be exchanged by a target application between a first platform (e.g.,the domestic application platform 3014) and a second platform (e.g., theoverseas application platform 3048). Depending on the direction ofexchange, the original data may be from the first platform and may bereceived by the DES adapter 3061 in the DES 1040. Or the original datamay be from the second platform and may be received by the DES adapter3070 in the DES 1040.

At block 3302, the DES 1040 processes the original data based on thetype of the original data to obtain a normalized data corresponding tothe type. The processing on the original data (may also referred to aspre-processing) may be determined according to the type of the originaldata. The type of the original data may comprise, for example, MQ data,offline aggregated data, TOS data or service invocation data, etc.Further, in some cases, the processing on the original data may also bedetermined according to various sources of data. For example, accordingto the data source, the original data may be divided into domestic userdata, overseas user data or engineering technology data. Different typesof data correspond to different formats, and corresponding normalizeddata may be generated in different ways.

In some embodiments, since techniques used by the data source differ,the same type of data might be provided in different formats, which addsrequirements to the technical processing. Therefore, a normalized formatmay be specified. In the pre-processing stage, the format of theoriginal data may be converted to a specified format under the typethrough format conversion, to normalize the data.

For example, for MQ data, MQ data in different formats may be parsed toanalyze contents of messages encapsulated in different formats. Foroffline aggregated data and TOS data, different requests from filesystems or data systems in different formats for invoking these data maybe converted into file call requests implemented by uniform API. Forservice invocation, service invocation requests generated underdifferent protocols may be converted into service invocation requests ina uniform protocol.

For specific pre-processing on different types of data, a more detaileddescription will be presented below.

At block 3303, the DES 1040 determines whether the normalized data meetsa data exchange constraint. For example, the DES center 3065 in the DES1040, especially the DES center 3065 of a corresponding data type maycheck whether the data exchange constraint is met or not. Through thenormalized pre-processing, the DES center 3065 does not need to parsethe original data by different techniques, so that the data security andcompliance may be checked more conveniently by using rules.

At block 3304, if it is determined that the normalized data meets thedata exchange constraint, the DES 1010 converts the normalized data intothe original data. In the situation that the data exchange constraint ismet, the data is allowed to be synchronized between platforms. In orderto guarantee the correct synchronization of data, the DES 1040 willfurther process the normalized data to convert the normalized data intothe original data, which has an original format.

At block 3305, the DES 1040 performs an exchange of the original databetween the first platform and the second platform. Thereby, the dataexchange meeting the security and compliance may be realized.

In some embodiments, as briefly mentioned above, a plurality of datachannels corresponding to different type of original data may be createdbetween different platforms, and different types of original data willbe delivered to corresponding data channels for processing. Each datachannel may comprise a pre-processing component, a post-processingcomponent and a confirming component about data exchange constraint,which are suitable to process this type of original data. In addition,or alternatively, each data channel may be registered with a dataexchange constraint to be applied to the specific type of original data.In this way, it is possible to realize the separation of pre-processing,confirming of data exchange constraint and post-processing for differenttypes of data.

Data channels corresponding to different types of data may be flexiblycreated, updated and deleted. Thus, if the pre-processing andpost-processing of data change or the data exchange constraint for thespecific type of data needs to be updated, the change or update may beperformed in the respective data channel without any impact on otherdata channels. In addition, according to business needs, if a new typeof original data needs to be exchanged between the first platform andthe second platform and the new type of data is also subject to thecheck on data sovereignty protection, then a new data channel may becreated between the first platform and the second platform to processthe new type of original data.

FIG. 3E shows a flowchart of an example data flow 3005 of various typesof data processing performed in the DES 1040 according to someembodiments of the present disclosure. The data flow 3005 involves acontrol-plane data flow and a data-plane data flow.

At the control plane, the operation and maintenance staff may configureone or more types of data channels in the DES 1040 and perform theupdate and maintenance of channels. As shown in FIG. 3E, the domesticoperation and maintenance staff may, via the DES entry 3062, request toconfigure a specific data type and a channel for processing the specificdata type and register a data directory 3081 indicating the specificdata type and a data definition 3082 similar to the specific data to aDES registration center 3066. The data definition 3082 may specifychannel information for processing different types of data in the DES1040 and may comprise a pre-processing solution and a post-processingsolution about a respective type of data.

Similarly, the overseas operation and maintenance staff may, via the DESentry 3072, request to configure a specific data type and a channel forprocessing the specific data type. The overseas operation andmaintenance staff may also register a data directory 3084 indicating thespecific data type and a data definition 3085 similar to the specificdata to the DES registration center 3066. The data definition 3085 mayspecify channel information for processing different types of data inthe DES 1040 and may comprise a pre-processing solution and apost-processing solution about a corresponding type of data.

At the data plane, different types of data will pass their respectivechannels in the DES 1040. As shown in FIG. 3E, for service invocationdata, a service invocation request is exchanged between a client or aserver 3086 on the TTP IDC side and a client or a server 3090 on theoverseas IDC side. In order to make the service invocation request meetthe data sovereignty protection requirements, the service invocationrequest is processed in the service invocation channel in the DES 1040.

In the example of FIG. 3E, the service invocation channel may at leastcomprise a pre-processing module 3087 in the DES proxy 3063, an HTTPproxy 3088 in the DES center 3065, and a routing module 3089 in the DESproxy 3073. The service invocation request from the client or server3086 at the TTP IDC side is transferred to the pre-processing module3087. The pre-processing module 3087 processes the service invocationrequest by using a data pre-processing solution specified in the datadefinition 3082 and sends the normalized service invocation request tothe HTTP proxy 3088.

In this example, suppose the service invocation request is formattedinto a request that conforms to a uniform protocol, i.e., HTTP protocol.Therefore, the HTTP proxy 3088 may, after determining that thenormalized service invocation request meets the data exchangeconstraint, provides the normalized service invocation request throughthe routing module 3089 to the client or server 3090 at the other side.Before being provided to the client or server 3090, the normalizedservice invocation request is converted back to a service invocationrequest that conforms to an original protocol.

For MQ data, such a type of original data is processed in the MQ channelin the DES 1040. In the example of FIG. 3E, the MQ channel may at leastcomprise a pre-processing module 3092 in the DES proxy 3063, an MQtransmitter 3094 in the DES center 3065, and a routing module 3097 inthe DES proxy 3073.

Original data 3091 of the MQ type is transferred to the pre-processingmodule 3092. The pre-processing module 3092 uses a data pre-processingsolution specified in the data definition 3082 to process the originaldata 3091 to obtain normalized data 3093. The normalized data 3093 isextracted by the MQ transmitter 3094, e.g., extracted via a third-partysoftware development kit (SDK). After passing the data exchangeconstraint check, SDK pushes normalized data 3096 that meets rules tothe overseas IDC. Normalized data 3095 that does not meet rules isrejected. The routing module 3097 routes the normalized data 3096 thatmeets rules to a corresponding destination. Before being transmitted tothe corresponding destination, the normalized data 3093 is convertedback to corresponding original data 3098.

For offline aggregated data and TOS data, original data is processed inthe HDFS channel and the TOS channel in the DES 1040, respectively. Forthe brevity purpose, FIG. 3E shows an example of a channel. However, itis to be understood that the HDFS channel and the TOS channel maycomprise components which are shown. In the example of FIG. 3E, the HDFSchannel and the TOS channel may at least comprise a pre-processingmodule 3100 in the DES proxy 3063, a file transmitter 3103 in the DEScenter 3065, and a routing module 3105 in the DES 3073.

Since data of the offline aggregated data type or TOS type is stored ina file system or other storage system, the pre-processing module 3100may initiate a request for invoking a file transfer API to a filetransfer manager 3102 to obtain original data 3099 of the offlineaggregated data type or TOS type. The original data 3099 is transferredto the pre-processing module 3100. The pre-processing module 3100 mayuse a data pre-processing solution specified in the data definition 3082to process the original data 3099 to obtain normalized data 3101.

Like the data processing of MQ type, the normalized data 3101 isextracted by the file transmitter 3103, e.g., via SDK. After passing thedata exchange constraint check, SDK pushes normalized data 3104 thatmeets rules to the overseas IDC. Normalized data that does not meetrules is rejected and cannot be transferred to the overseas IDC. Therouting module 3105 routes the normalized data 3104 that meets rules toa corresponding destination. Before being transmitted to thecorresponding destination, the normalized data 3104 is converted back tocorresponding original data 3106.

It is to be understood that FIG. 3E only shows the processing ofoutgoing data from the TTP IDC to the overseas IDC in the DES 1040. Fora data flow in the opposite direction, it can also be processed througha similar process in the DES 1040, and the DES 1040 may retain acorresponding component for supporting the respective processing,especially a component in the DES adapter.

A detailed discussion is presented below to some example implementationsfor different types of data in the DES 1040.

Example Implementation of Data Exchange for MQ Data

FIG. 3F shows a schematic block diagram of data exchange architecture3006 involving an MQ channel according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure. The data exchange architecture 3006 may beimplemented in the DES 1040 for performing data security protection onMQ-type data. In the example of FIG. 3F, a data exchange from the TTPIDC to the overseas IDC is shown.

As shown in FIG. 3F, a source database 3110 in the TTP IDC generates anentity of to-be-transferred MQ data. The MQ data may comprise MQ datamay include messages such as change data or business customizationevents, and different messages may have different formats. The MQ datagenerated by the source database 3110 is placed in a source messagequeue 3112.

In the example of FIG. 3F, the DES adapter 3061 further comprises a DESpre-adapter 3120 besides the DES entry 3062. The DES pre-adapter 3120may be implemented as a part of the DES proxy 3063 for performingpre-processing on the MQ data from the TTP IDC to the overseas IDC. TheDES pre-adapter 3120 may be configured to process MQ data in differentformats into normalized MQ data in a normalized format and provide thenormalized MQ data to an MQ transmitter 3094 to determine whether thedata exchange constraint is met or not.

The MQ data (or message) may also comprise data generated underdifferent protocols, data under each protocol having a customizedformat, so different pre-processing is required. As shown in FIG. 3F,the DES pre-adapter 3120 may comprise a parser 3122 which is configuredto parse different types of original MQ data to convert different typesof original data into normalized data in a normalized format. As shownin FIG. 3F, the DES pre-adapter 3120 may comprise a MySQL parser forparsing data generated through the MySQL protocol, e.g., change datacapture (CDC) data; a Redis parser for parsing data generated throughthe Redis protocol, such as CDC data; a document parser for parsing datain the document database, especially CDC data; a graph parser forparsing data in a graph database, especially CDC data; an MQ parser forparsing different types of business event data sent through a messagequeue, etc. It is to be understood that the parser 3122 is flexiblyscalable, wherein more, fewer or other parsers can be set for parsing arespective type of MQ data.

The normalized MQ data obtained from the parse may also be in the formof a message queue and may be placed in a queue 3124 of normalizedmessages. In VPC2 of TTP IDC, the MQ transmitter 3094 in charge of MQdata may extract the parsed normalized MQ data from the normalizedmessage queue 3124 through the SDK for data security and compliancechecks. Normalized MQ data that does not meet the data security andcompliance check is rejected by the MQ transmitter 3094 and recorded ina rejected log 3126. Normalized MQ data that meets the data exchangeconstraint is pushed via the SDK to a DES post-adapter 3130 in the DESadapter 3070.

The DES post-adapter 3130 may be implemented as a part of the DES proxy3073 to perform post-processing on the normalized MQ data from the TTPIDC to the overseas IDC to transfer data to a destination. Thenormalized MQ data that meets the data exchange constraint is pushed tothe DES post-adapter 3130 via the SDK.

The DES post-adapter 3130 may comprise a data replayer 3132 forperforming post-processing on the normalized MQ data. Specifically, theDES post-adapter 3130 may be configured to convert the normalized MQdata into original MQ data. Therefore, the DES post-adapter 3130 maycomprise replayers corresponding to different types of MQ data, forconversion from a normalized format to respective customized formats. Asshown in FIG. 3F, the DES post-adapter 3130 may comprise a MySQLreplayer for converting normalized MQ data into MQ data that conforms tothe MySQL protocol; a Redis replayer for converting normalized MQ datainto MQ data that conforms to the Redis protocol; a document replayerfor converting normalized MQ data into original data in the graph form;an MQ replayer for converting normalized MQ data into original data thatconforms to the MQ protocol, etc.

The converted original MQ data may be placed in a queue 3134 ofnormalized messages and may be synchronized to a target message queue3135. The target message queue 3135 is used for save MQ data which isindirectly synchronized from a source message queue 3112 via the DES1040. The target database 3136 may obtain desired MQ data from thetarget message queue 3135.

FIG. 3F only shows components involved in the data exchange from the TTPIDC to the overseas IDC. The example in FIG. 3F shows the data exchangefrom the overseas IDC to the TTP IDC. The DES 1040 may comprise similarcomponents for processing the data exchange in this direction, forexample, the DES adapter 3070 may comprise a DES pre-adapter withsimilar functions to the DES pre-adapter 3120, and the DES adapter 3061may comprise a DES post adapter with similar functions to the DESpost-adapter 3130. For the brevity purpose, the processing in thisdirection is not detailed.

It is to be understood that the component for processing the MQ dataexchange in the DES as shown in FIG. 3F are merely exemplary. In otherexamples, depending on needs, different functional modules may furtherbe refined, combined and the like in other way, and may further comprisemore, less or different functional modules.

Example Implementation of Data Exchange for Offline Aggregated Data

FIG. 3G shows a schematic block diagram of data exchange architecture3500 involving the HDFS channel according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure. The data exchange architecture 3500 may beimplemented in the DES 1040 for performing data security protection onoffline aggregated data. In the example of FIG. 3G, there is shown anoffline aggregated data exchange between an HDFS 3502 on the TTP IDCside and an HDFS 3504 on the overseas IDC side. Some offline aggregateddata between the HDFS 3502 and the HDFS 3504 might need to besynchronized with each other.

As shown in FIG. 3G, in the data exchange architecture 3500, a datatransfer detector 3510 on the TTP IDC side is responsible for detectingwhether offline aggregated data to be transferred to the HDFS 3504 atthe other side is stored in the HDFS 3052. Where offline aggregated datato be transferred is found, a data transfer submitter 3520 may submit arequest for data transfer to a file transmitter 3550. Before the requestis submitted to the file transmitter, a data pre-processing module 3530is configured to perform data pre-processing to process offlineaggregated data into normalized data.

In the file transmitter 3550, a data transfer server 3556 is configuredto control data transfer services based on a data exchange constraint.If the data transfer server 3556 determines that the pre-processednormalized data from the HDFS 3502 conforms to the data exchangeconstraint, then a transfer job 3558 may be invoked to transfer thenormalized data to the overseas IDC through a transfer task 3562 underthe transfer job 3558. In some embodiments, the transfer job 3558 mayfurther optionally a data verification task 3560, which may beconfigured to perform data verification according to needs. Thenormalized data passes an HDFS gateway 3564 and may be processed toobtain original offline aggregated data which is then saved in the HDFS3504.

Similarly, in the data exchange architecture 3500, a data transferdetector 3570 on the overseas IDC side is responsible for detectingwhether offline aggregated data to be transferred to the HDFS 3502 atthe TTP IDC side is stored in the HDFS 3054. Where offline aggregateddata to be transferred is found, a data transfer submitter 3572 maysubmit a request for data transfer to a file transmitter 3550. Beforethe request is submitted to the file transmitter, a data pre-processingmodule 3570 is configured to perform data pre-processing to processoffline aggregated data into normalized data.

In the file transmitter 3550, if the data transfer server 3556determines that the pre-processed normalized data from the HDFS 3504conforms to the data exchange constraint, then a transfer job 3554 maybe invoked to transfer the normalized data to the TTP IDC through atransfer task 3552 under the transfer job 3554. Original offlineaggregated data is obtained through processing the normalized data andthen saved in the HDFS 3502.

It is to be understood that components for processing the offlineaggregated data exchange in the DES as shown in FIG. 3G are merelyexemplary. In other examples, depending on needs, different functionalmodules may further be refined, combined and the like in other way, andmay further comprise more, less or different functional modules.

Example Implementation of Data Exchange for Object Storage

In general, the TOS channel may determine whether an object file meetsthe data exchange constraint, and copy the object file from a source IDC(e.g., the TTP IDC or overseas IDC) to a destination IDC (e.g., theoverseas IDC or TTP IDC) where the constraint is met. The object filemay be, for example, a video, audio, image, document or other mediafile.

In some embodiments, the object file may be copied from an objectstorage through API to determine whether the data exchange constraint ismet, and push the object file to the object storage on the destinationend through API. In the data exchange of the object file, whether thedata exchange constraint is met is determined through a copy requestcorresponding to the object file. Details of the TOS channel will bedescribed with reference to FIG. 3H to FIG. 3J.

FIG. 3H shows a schematic view of a target object storage (TOS) channel3600 for copying data from the TTP IDC to the overseas IDC according tosome embodiments of the present disclosure. In this example, data to beexchanged is an object file, which is stored in an object storage 3606in the TTP IDC and desired to be exchanged to an object storage 3607 inthe overseas IDC.

In FIG. 3H, an API 3605 in the TTP IDC is configured to push the copyrequest to a working node 3605 and receive from the working node 3605 acopy result which is exchanged from the overseas IDC on the other side.As depicted, when a data flow starts 3601, the copy request for theobject file to be exchanged is transferred to the working node 3605through an API 3602 (also referred to as a DES-TOS API). The copyrequest may indicate information related to the object file to beexchanged, e.g., a format (video, audio, text, etc.) of the object file,an identifier of the object file, and other file metadata, etc. The copyrequest has a normalized format.

The working node 3605 within the trusted-area VPC2 is configured toperform a determination of the data exchange constraint in response tothe copy request for the target file. Specifically, the working node3605 may determine from the normalized copy request whether the objectfile to be exchanged meets the data exchange constraint.

In some embodiments, at the TTP IDC side, a registration of the dataexchange constraint may be initiated at the initial stage or when neededlater. When the constraint registration starts 3622, the used dataexchange constraint may be registered to a DES registration center 3624in the TTP-trusted area through a DES entry 3620 in the TTP IDC. Theregistration of the data exchange constraint may be implemented byinvoking the API 3602. The working node 3605 may access the dataexchange constraint to be used currently through the DES registrationcenter 3624.

In some embodiments, the data exchange constraint may indicate awhitelist of object files which are allowed to be exchanged or ablacklist of object files which are not allowed to be exchanged, and ineach list file objects which are allowed or not allowed to be exchangedmay be identified by formats, identifiers and the like of object files.

In performing the data exchange constraint, the working node 3605 allowsthe copy request that meets the data exchange constraint to be executed.If the copy request is allowed to be executed, the working node 3605accesses the object storage 3606 in the TTP IDC to copy the object fileto the object storage 3607 in the overseas IDC. For illegal requests(i.e., copy requests that do not meet the data exchange constraint),they will be rejected and thus cannot be executed. The working node 3605may write the copied object file to the object storage 3607 through anAPI 3610 in the overseas IDC. Thus, the data flow ends 3611.

FIG. 3I shows a schematic view of a TOS channel 3650 for copying datafrom the overseas IDC to the TTP IDC according to some embodiments ofthe present disclosure. In this example, an object file to be exchangedis stored in the object storage 3607 in the overseas TTP IDC and desiredto be exchanged to the object storage 3606 in the TTP IDC.

In FIG. 3I, the API 3610 in the overseas IDC is configured to push thecopy request to the working node 3605 and receive from the working node3605 a copy result which is exchanged from the TTP IDC on the otherside. As shown in FIG. 3I, when a data flow starts 3651, the copyrequest for the object file to be exchanged is transferred to theworking node 3605 through the API 3610. The copy request may indicateinformation related to the object file to be exchanged, e.g., a format(video, audio, text, etc.) of the object file, an identifier of theobject file, and other file metadata, etc. The copy request has anormalized format. The working node 3605 within the trusted-area VPC2may determine from the normalized copy request whether the object fileto be exchanged meets the data exchange constraint.

In some embodiments, on the overseas IDC side, a registration of thedata exchange constraint may be initiated at the initial stage or whenneeded later. When the constraint registration starts 3632, the useddata exchange constraint may be registered to the DES registrationcenter 3624 in the TTP-trusted area through a DES entry 3630 in theoverseas IDC. The registration of the data exchange constraint may beimplemented by invoking the API 3610. The working node 3605 may accessthe data exchange constraint to be used currently through the DESregistration center 3624.

In performing the data exchange constraint, the working node 3605 allowsthe copy request that meets the data exchange constraint to be executed.If the copy request is allowed to be executed, the working node 3605accesses the object storage 3607 in the overseas IDC to copy the objectfile to the object storage 3607 in the TTP IDC. For illegal requests(i.e., copy requests that do not meet the data exchange constraint),they will be rejected and thus cannot be executed. The working node 3605may write the copied object file to the object storage 3606 through theAPI 3602 in the TTP IDC. Thus, the data flow ends 3652.

It is to be understood that components for processing the TOS dataexchange in the DES as shown in FIGS. 3H and 3I are merely exemplary. Inother examples, depending on requirements, different functional modulesmay further be refined, merged and the like in other way, and mayfurther comprise more, less or different functional modules.

FIG. 3J shows a message sequence 3012 in the TOS channel according tosome embodiments of the present disclosure. The message sequence 3012 inFIG. 3J involves a TTP 3701, operation and maintenance staff 3702,platform working staff 3703, a DES entry 3704, an API 3705, the workingnode 3605 and an object storage 3708.

Depending on the direction of the data exchange, the DES entry 3704, theAPI 3705 and the object storage 3708 in FIG. 3J may be correspondingcomponents in any of FIGS. 3H and 3I. For example, in the TOS channel3600 for copying data from the TTP IDC to the overseas IDC as shown inFIG. 3H, the DES entry 3704 comprises the DES entry 3620 shown in FIG.3H, the API 3705 comprises the API 3602 shown in FIG. 3H, and the objectstorage 3708 comprises the object storage 3606 in FIG. 3H. In the TOSchannel 3650 for copying data from the overseas IDC to the TTP IDC, theDES entry 3704 comprises the DES entry 3630 shown in FIG. 3I, the API3705 comprises the API 3610 shown in FIG. 3I, and the object storage3708 comprises the object storage 3607 in FIG. 3I.

In the message sequence 3012, the operation and maintenance staff 3702registers 3711 a data exchange constraint to the DES entry 3704, whichmay constrain the copy of an object file between the object storage 3606and 3607 in different IDCs. After the registration is completed, the DESentry 3704 may send 3714 a response to the operation and maintenancestaff. The DES entry 3704 registers 3712 container information about thedata exchange constraint to the API 3705, and the API 3705 may send 3713a response to the DES entry 3704 after the registration is completed.Rules registered via the DES entry 3704 may be cached 3715 to the API3705 and may also be cached 3716 to the working node 3605.

The platform working staff 3703 may initiate 3717 a copy request for theobject file to the API 3705. The API 3705 may perform an authentication3718. The working node 3605 may pull 3719 the copy request from the API3705, and perform 3720 a determination of the data exchange constrainton the object file to be copied. If the object file is allowed to becopied, the working node 3605 performs 3721 the file copy to copy thecorresponding object file from the object storage 3706. Regardless ofthe result of the data exchange determination, the working node 3605will return 3722 a feedback to the API 3705. Where the object file isallowed to be copied, the feedback comprises the copied object file.Where the object file is not allowed to be copied, the feedback is usedto indicate that the copy request is rejected.

In some embodiments, the platform working staff 3703 may call back 3723the API 3705, and a copy request ID may be returned 3724 from the API3705 to the platform working staff 3703. In some embodiments, the TTP3701 may view 3725 situation about historical object file copies throughthe DES entry 3704 to confirm whether the exchange of object files in apast period of time meets the requirements of data exchange constraints.The DES entry 3704 may return 3726 a result of the view.

Example Implementation of Data Exchange Protection for Serviceinvocation

FIG. 3K shows a schematic block diagram of data exchange architecture3800 involving a service invocation channel according to someembodiments of the present disclosure. The data exchange architecture3800 may be implemented in the DES 1040 to perform data securityprotection on data of the service invocation type. In the example ofFIG. 3L, there is shown a service invocation data exchange between atarget platform service 3802 at the TTP IDC side and an overseas(non-TTP) platform service 3804 at the overseas IDC side. For example, aservice on the target platform service 3802 might need toinvoke aservice on the overseas platform service 3804, and vice versa, a serviceon the overseas platform service 3804 might need to invoke a service onthe target platform service 3802.

Different service platforms might apply different service invocationprotocols, such as the HTTP protocol or Thrift RPC protocol. In someembodiments of the present disclosure, it is hoped that normalized data,e.g., HTTP protocol data can be processed when performing datasovereignty protection in the VPC trusted area.

In FIG. 3K, at the control plane, the non-TTP control plane is used forchannel registration, channel architecture update and detection; theTTP/TTP plane is used for channel request approval, channel prohibition,channel detection, etc. At the data plane, an HTTP load balancer 3810 isan L7 balancer product from TTP Cloud, which is a key component forensuring all DES-RPC channel traffic to pass the VPR trusted area. AnHTTP channel is a channel among DES-RPC channels which supports the HTTPprotocol. A Thrift RPC channel is a channel among DES-RPC channels whichsupports the Thrift RPC protocol. Before being sent to the HTTP loadbalancer of the TTP, the Thrift RPC channel will be wrapped in the HTTPchannel.

At the channel registration stage, the DES-RPC channel uses channelinformation and data definition to declare. The channel information maycomprise a channel type, such as Thrift RPC or HTTP. The channelinformation may further comprise an RPC call tuples. The call tuples mayinclude src dc, src services, dst dc, dst services, rpc methods/httppaths.

The data definition may depend on the direction of data flow. For a dataflow from non-TTP to TTP, Thrift IDL with compliance annotations will beused to declare the response. For a data flow from TTP to non-TTP,Thrift IDL with compliance annotations will be used to declare therequest. In some embodiments, only when the DES-RPC channel passes thecompliance registration, the DES-RPC channel is available.

It is to be understood that the components for processing the serviceinvocation data exchange in the DES as shown in FIG. 3K is merelyexemplary. In other examples, depending on needs, different functionalmodules may further be refined, combined and the like in other way, andmay further comprise more, less or different functional modules.

FIG. 3L shows an example of data exchange from non-TTP to TTP in theservice invocation channel shown in FIG. 3K according to someembodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3L, aninvocation initiated by service A 3901 in an overseas region will beforwarded by an HTTP proxy 3902 or a Thrift proxy 3903 to a TTP HTTPload balancer 3905. The service A 3901 may be one example of theoverseas platform service shown in FIG. 3K. For an HTTP request, theinvocation will be forwarded by the HTTP proxy 3902 to the HTTP loadbalancer 3905. For a Thrift request, the invocation will be forwarded bythe Thrift proxy 3903 to the HTTP load balancer 3905.

It is suggested that the service discovery from the correspondingservice proxy in the overseas IDC, such as the HTTP proxy 3902 or Thriftproxy 3903 to the VPC trusted area HTTP load balancer 3905 should beimplemented through DNS, and it is suggested that the service discoveryof the corresponding request to the TTP IDC area should usecustomized/universal service discovery.

The HTTP load balancer 3905 may comprise a compliance plugin 3906. Foran illegal request, the compliance plugin 3906 will return an error. Fora Thrift rpc invocation, the request will be wrapped by HTTP to generatea new HTTP request. The body of the new HTTP request is a Thrift binaryfile.

In the VPC trusted area, the HTTP load balancer 3905 of the TTP forwardsrequests to the HTTP proxy 3907 and the Thrift proxy 3908 of the TTPrespectively, and the HTTP proxy 3907 and the Thrift proxy 3908 forwardsrequests to service B 3908 and service C 3910 as target servicesrespectively. For a Thrift rpc invocation, the Thrift proxy 3908restores an original Thrift request from the generated new HTTP requestbefore sending the request.

The TTP HTTP proxy 3907 and the Thrift proxy 3908 check responses beforesending the responses to the TTP HTTP load balancer 3905. For a responsethat does not pass the compliance check, an error will be returned. Inaddition, for the Thrift rpc invocation, the Thrift response will bewrapped by HTTP to generate a new HTTP response. The body of the newHTTP response is a Thrift binary file.

FIG. 3M shows an example of data exchange from TTP to non-TTP in theservice invocation channel shown in FIG. 3K according to someembodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3M, aninvocation initiated by TTP service A 3951 will be forwarded by a TTPHTTP proxy 3952 and a Thrift proxy 3953 to a TTP HTTP load balancer3955. For an HTTP request, the invocation will be forwarded by the HTTPproxy 3952 to the HTTP load balancer 3955. For a Thrift request, theinvocation will be forwarded by the Thrift proxy 3953 to the HTTP loadbalancer 3955.

For an illegal request, an error will be returned. For a response thatdoes not pass the compliance check, an error will be returned. For theThrift rpc invocation, the request will be wrapped by HTTP to generate anew HTTP response. The body of the new HTTP response is a Thrift binaryfile.

The HTTP load balancer 3955 of the TTP forwards requests to non-TTP(i.e., overseas) HTTP proxy 3957 and a Thrift proxy 3958 respectively.Then, the HTTP proxy 3957 and the Thrift proxy 3958 forward requests tooverseas service B 39598 and service C 3960.

For a Thrift rpc invocation, the Thrift proxy restores an originalThrift request from the generated new HTTP request before sending therequest.

The non-TTP HTTP proxy 3957 and the Thrift proxy 3958 send responses theTTP HTTP load balancer 3955. For the Thrift rpc invocation, the Thriftresponse will be wrapped by HTTP to generate a new HTTP response. Thebody of the new HTTP response is a Thrift binary file.

Security Sandbox Sub-System

A client application needs to communicate with a server to transmitdata. The traffic data of the client application may transmit a largeamount of user data. Therefore, there is a need for a method that canmanage the traffic data of the client application, so that user datawill not be transmitted to an unapproved server via the traffic data ofthe client application. For example, in the scenario of data sovereigntyprotection, the method may prevent user data from being transmitted to aserver in a non-data sovereignty country.

However, there are great varieties of types of traffic data of clientapplications. Client applications may comprise mobile applications andcomputer (PC) applications. Traffic data of the client application maycomprise native-type traffic data and WebView-type traffic data, etc. Inaddition, not all traffic data of the client application is under themanagement and control of the owner of the application. For example,traffic data of the client application may comprise traffic data from athird-party advertiser. Therefore, it is very difficult to managevarious types of traffic data for client applications.

An example embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a method formanaging traffic data of a client application. The method comprises:detecting a transmission of user data of a target user from the clientapplication to a server; analyzing the traffic data of the transmissionat different layers of the transmission based on types of the trafficdata; and in accordance with a determination that the analysis indicatesthat the traffic data satisfies a data exchange constraint correspondingto the target user, transmitting the traffic data to a server incompliance with the data exchange constraint.

In this way, by analyzing the traffic data at different levels of thetransmission based on the type of the traffic data and limiting thetransmission of traffic data that does not meet the data exchangeconstraint, it is possible to effectively prevent user data from beingtransmitted to an unapproved server via various types of traffic data.

A detailed description is presented below to illustrate the embodimentsof the present disclosure with reference to the accompanying drawings. Amobile application will be used as an example to illustrate the solutionof the present disclosure.

FIG. 4A shows a flowchart of an example method 4100 for managing trafficdata of a mobile application according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure. The method 4100 may be implemented at the securitysandbox sub-system 1090 of FIG. 1. The mobile application may be thetarget application 1080 on the mobile end.

At block 4102, a transmission of user data of a target user from theclient application to a server is detected. In other words, if it isdetermined that a current user is the target user, then the securitysandbox sub-system 1090 may detect transmission of user data of thetarget user.

In some implementations, traffic data may be routed to the securitysandbox sub-system 1090 based on the determination of the target user,so that the security sandbox sub-system 1090 may detect and analyzetraffic data corresponding to the transmission of the user data. Thesecurity sandbox sub-system 1090 may analyze a network request of thetarget application 1080 and limit a network request that does not meet acondition based on a data exchange constraint.

The data exchange constraint may comprise an exchange constraint aboutdata sovereignty, e.g., data sovereignty protection rules. The datasovereignty protection rules may be determined according to regulationsof various countries or regions. The data sovereignty protection rulesmay also be determined by operators of applications (e.g., related touser data use protocols).

The data sovereignty protection rules may be set based on a specificscenario. For example, the data sovereignty protection rules may specifythat user data of a data sovereignty country is not allowed to betransmitted to any server outside the data sovereignty country. In otherimplementations, the data sovereignty protection rules may specify thatprivate user data of a data sovereignty country is not allowed to betransmitted to any unregistered server. The scope of the presentdisclosure is not limited in this regard.

As shown in FIG. 1, the network request of the target application 1080is transmitted to the application firewall sub-system 1020 after beinganalyzed and processed by the security sandbox sub-system 1090. Theprinciples and details of the security sandbox sub-system 1090 will bedescribed in detail below.

The target user refers to a user for which the transmission of user dataneeds to be detected and managed. The target user may be a user with thenationality of a data sovereignty country. Alternatively, or inaddition, the target user may also be a user determined according tospecific rules of data sovereignty protection. For example, the targetuser may be a user who has the nationality of a data sovereignty countryand is currently geographically located in the data sovereign country.

In some implementations, the target user may be determined based on userinformation. The user information may comprise user account information,personal information, registration information, etc. Alternatively, orin addition, the target user may be determined based on deviceinformation. The device information may comprise subscriber identitymodule (SIM) information, an IP address, network service providerinformation, system setting information of a device, application settinginformation, etc.

In some implementations, the target user may be determined based oncombinations of a plurality of types of information. The plurality oftypes of information may have different priorities. For example, thepriority of SIM information and network service provider information maybe higher than that of IP address, system setting information,application setting information, etc.

In some implementations, the determination of the target user may bebased on a region where the target user is located. The region where thetarget user is located may be determined using the above userinformation or device information to determine the target user. Forexample, the region where the user is currently located may bedetermined using region setting in system setting of a smartphone, andthus it may be determined whether the current user is the target user.For another example, the region where the target user is located may bedetermined using country code in the SIM card, and thus the target usermay be determined.

In some implementations, the target user may be determined when theapplication is initiated for the first time. In other words, whether thecurrent user is the target user may be determined when the applicationis initiated for the first time. Alternatively, or in addition, it maybe determined whether the current user is the target user during userregistration. Alternatively, or in addition, it may be determinedwhether the current user is the target user when the user logs in to,logs out of, or switches an account.

In some implementations, a result of the determination may be storedlocally or in a server. The result may be determined after the user isdetermined as the target user for the first time, and it may be set thatthe stored result is used within a threshold time period. Thus, when theuser logs in later, the user does not need to be determined again.

At block 4104, the traffic data of the transmission is analyzed atdifferent layers of the transmission based on types of the traffic data.

The traffic data in the target application 1080 may comprise a pluralityof types of traffic data, such as traffic data of native, WebView andthird-party software development kit (SDK) types. The traffic data ofthe native type is generated and processed by the operating system (forexample, Android and IOS) code in the business layer. Traffic data ofthe native type may be completely controlled by the owner of the targetapplication 1080.

The traffic data of the third-party SDK type is generated and processedby the third-party SDK. Usually, the third-party SDK may access thetarget application 1080 to realize the function of login or sharing. Thetraffic data of the third-party SDK type is generated and processed bythird-party SDKs. It is to be understood that the traffic data of thethird-party SDK type is usually not completely controlled by the ownerof the application.

The traffic data of WebView type may comprise traffic data controlled bythe owner of the application, e.g., traffic data generated by thebuilt-in browser of the application by invoking the code of the nativeapplication. The traffic data of the WebView type may further comprisetraffic data controlled by a third party, e.g., traffic data generatedand controlled by third-party advertisers.

Based on the type of the traffic data, the security sandbox sub-system1090 may adopt a respective analysis policy to better manage thetransmission of user data in the application.

At block 4106, in accordance with a determination that the analysisindicates that the traffic data satisfies a data exchange constraintcorresponding to the target user, the traffic data is transmitted to aserver in compliance with the data exchange constraint. Different dataexchange constraints may be set for different target users. For example,stricter data exchange constraints can be set for target users withhigher sensitivity levels. The data exchange constraint may limit whichuser data may be transmitted to which servers. In some implementations,a data exchange constraint corresponding to the target user may bedetermined based on the user information of the target user or thecorresponding device information.

In some implementations, the security sandbox sub-system 1090 maycomprise a plurality of sub-modules for different types of traffic data,such as s sub-module for managing traffic data of native type, asub-module for managing traffic data of WebView type and a sub-modulefor managing traffic data of third-party SDK type. These sub-modules mayanalyze respective types of traffic data and restrict or intercepttraffic data that does not meet the data exchange constraint. Details ofthe management of different types of traffic data will be described withreference to FIGS. 4B to 4E.

FIG. 4B shows a schematic view of an analysis and restriction process4200 for traffic data of native type according to some embodiments ofthe present disclosure. FIG. 4B shows a sub-module 4210 for analyzingand restricting traffic data of native type. The sub-module 4210 is apart of the security sandbox sub-system 1090 and may also be a specificimplementation of the security sandbox sub-system 1090.

As shown in FIG. 4B, a business logic layer 4220 issues a networkrequest to an underlying OS 4230. The business logic layer 4220 may be aspecific implementation of the application business logic 1100 shown inFIG. 1 in terms of transmission. The sub-module 4210 may be used as aninterceptor to analyze and restrict the network request at the networklayer. The sub-module 4210 may restrict the network request by analyzingendpoints, a parameter or schema of the network request. For example, itmay determine whether to restrict the network request depending onwhether the schema has been registered. Alternatively, or in addition,it may determine whether to restrict the network request depending onwhether the requested field in the network request involves sensitiveinformation.

In some implementations, the sub-module 4210 may comprise an interceptorfor Android and an interceptor for IDS. In addition, the sub-module 4210may also comprise an interceptor for C++. In this way, by analyzing andrestricting the network request at the network layer, it may be betterjudged whether the network request is to be restricted, based onprotocol information of the network request.

FIG. 4C shows a schematic view of an analysis and restriction process4300 for traffic data of WebView type according to some embodiments ofthe present disclosure. FIG. 4C shows a sub-module 4310 for analyzingand restricting traffic data of the WebView type. The sub-module 4310may be a part of the security sandbox sub-system 1090 and may also be aspecific implementation of the security sandbox sub-system 1090.

The sub-module 4310 may transfer traffic data of the WebView type to anative network interface, so that the traffic data of the WebView typemay be analyzed and restricted by the sub-module 4210 for traffic dataof the native type. In some implementations, the sub-module 4310 may usea hook mechanism of JavaScript (JS) to transfer traffic data of theWebView type to the native network interface.

As shown in FIG. 4C, the sub-module 4310 may comprise a initiator 4311,a navigation URL interceptor 4312, and an internal request interceptor4313. The sub-module 4310 may communicate with a built-in browser 4320of the application, so that the traffic data of the WebView type may bemanaged and detected by the sub-module 4310. The initiator 4311 mayperform JS injection when the built-in browser 4320 of the applicationis opened (created), so that the traffic data of the WebView type may betransferred to the native network interface using the hook mechanism.The traffic data transferred to the native network interface may betaken over by a native network module.

In some implementations, the traffic data may be transferred using theJS hook technique in the following way.

The navigation URL interceptor 4312 may analyze and restrict URL of ahome page (initial page). For example, the navigation URL interceptor4312 may determine whether to restrict the network request depending onwhether the URL-based schema has been registered. If the network requestis not restricted, then the browser 4320 may load the home page.

The internal request interceptor 4313 may transfer traffic data relatedto static and dynamic resources of the home page to the native networkinterface, so that these traffic data may be restricted and analyzed bythe sub-module 4210 at the network layer. The specific analysis andrestriction process is similar to the native type traffic data and isnot detailed here.

In some implementations, the sub-module 4310 may adopt differentanalysis and restriction policies for WebView type traffic datacontrolled by the application's owner and WebView type traffic datacontrolled by a third party. For example, for WebView type traffic datacontrolled by a third party, it may only be determined using thenavigation URL interceptor 4312 whether URL of the home page has beenregistered, without further analyzing static and dynamic resources ofthe home page.

FIG. 4D shows a schematic view of an analysis and restriction process4400 for traffic data of third-party SDK type according to someembodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 4D shows a sub-module 4410for analyzing and restricting traffic data of the third-party SDK type.The sub-module 4410 may be a part of the security sandbox sub-system1090 and may also be a specific implementation of the security sandboxsub-system 1090.

The sub-module 4410 may analyze and restrict third-party SDK typetraffic data at the application program interface (API) layer. Thesub-module 4410 may restrict third-party SDK type traffic data byanalyzing at the API layer whether data requested by API of thethird-party SDK meets data exchange constraints.

In some implementations, the sub-module 4410 may wrap the API requestinguser data in the third-party SDK, and add judgment logic based on dataexchange constraints in the package. In other words, the sub-module 4410may add judgment logic to the API of the third-party SDK to determinewhether to wrap the API. Thus, the business logic layer 4220 does notdirectly invoke the API of the third-party SDK but invokes the wrappedAPI to which the judgment logic has been added.

As shown in FIG. 4D, the sub-module 4410 may comprise a wrapping modulefor each third-party SDK, such as a wrapping module 4412 for SDK 4411, awrapping module 4414 for SDK 4413, and a wrapping module 4416 for SDK4415. The wrapping module (e.g., wrapping module 4412) may wrap API inthe corresponding SDK (e.g., SDK 4411) to generate a correspondingwrapped API. In some implementations, the sub-module 4410 maydynamically increase a wrapping module to wrap an API of a third-partySDK.

In some implementations, an API of a third-party SDK may be wrapped inthe following way. The wrapping module 4412 may define an API which isexposed to the business layer and same as the API in the SDK 4411. Thewrapping module 4412 may realize the API and define a package categoryof the data type of the SDK 4411.

The judgment logic may determine based on data exchange constraintswhether the wrapped API of the third-party SDK may be invoked. In someimplementations, the judgment logic may analyze whether the API of thethird-party SDK may be invoked, based on a name of the SDK, a name ofthe API, a name of a parameter of the API and so on. If a result of thejudgment is yes, then the API of the third-party SDK may be invoked, anda value is returned to the business layer. If the result of the judgmentis no, then the API of the third-party SDK is not invoked, i.e., trafficdata related to the API is restricted. It is to be understood that thejudgment logic may change based on a specific scenario. For example, thejudgment logic may set that private data of a user is not allowed to besent to the third-party SDK.

In this way, through analysis and restriction at the API layer, thesub-module 4410 may manage and detect network the third-party SDK typetraffic data without the need to know internal code of the third-partySDK.

FIG. 4E shows a block diagram of the security sandbox sub-system 1090according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown inFIG. 4E, the security sandbox sub-system 1090 comprises an initiatormodule 4520. The initiator module 4520 is configured to, initiate adetection of a transmission of user data of a target user from theclient application to a server. The initiator module 4520 may activate amanagement module to detect, manage, analyze and restrict traffic datacorresponding to transmission of user data.

The management module is configured to analyze the traffic data of thetransmission at different layers of the transmission based on types ofthe traffic data; and transmit the traffic data to a server incompliance with the data exchange constraint in accordance with adetermination that the analysis indicates that the traffic datasatisfies a data exchange constraint corresponding to the target user.

In some implementations, the management module may comprise a sub-module(also referred to as a first management module) 4210, a sub-module (alsoreferred to as a second management module) 4310 and a sub-module (alsoreferred to as a third management module) 4410. The sub-modules 4210,4310 and 4410 may analyze and restrict traffic data of the clientapplication.

In some implementations, the sub-module 4210 is configured to analyzethe traffic data at the network layer in accordance with a determinationthat the traffic data is of a native type.

In some implementations, the sub-module 4310 is configured to, based onthe type of the traffic data being traffic data of the WebView type,transfer the traffic data of the WebView type to a network interface ofthe client application to be managed by a native network module of theclient application; and analyze the transferred traffic data at thenetwork layer.

In some implementations, transferring the traffic data of the WebViewtype to the network interface of the mobile application comprises: usinga hook mechanism of JavaScript to transfer the traffic data of theWebView type.

In some implementations, the sub-module 4410 is configured to analyzethe traffic data at the application program interface API layer based onthe type of the traffic data being traffic data of the third-party SDKtype.

In some implementations, analyzing the traffic data at the API layercomprises: determining to wrap an API by adding judgment logic based onthe data exchange constraint to the API of the third-party SDK; andinvoking the wrap API to use the judgment logic for analyzing thetraffic data.

In some implementations, the initiator module 4520 may activate thesub-modules 4210, 4310 and 4410 based on the determination of the targetuser. For example, the initiator module 4520 may determine during userregistration whether a current user is the target user. If a result ofthe determination is yes, then the initiator module 4520 may activatethe sub-modules 4210, 4310 and 4410. For another example, the initiatormodule 4520 may obtain the result of user determination locally or froma server during user login, and determine based on the result of thedetermination whether to activate the sub-modules 4210, 4310 and 4410.

The security sandbox sub-system 1090 may further comprise a samplingmodule 4510 for sampling traffic data. In some implementations, thesampling module 4510 may send to the initiator module 4520 a samplingsignal to trigger the initiator module 4520. The sampling signal mayindicate a sampling rate at which traffic data is sampled.

The sampling module 4510 may sample the target user and different typesof traffic data based on data exchange constraints. For example, thesampling module 4510 may sample different types of traffic data atdifferent sampling rates. With the sampling module 4510, not only aportion of traffic data may be analyzed, but also the overhead may bereduced and the application stability may be maintained.

It is to be understood that the security sandbox sub-system 1090 mayfurther comprise other module or only comprise a part of modules shownin FIG. 4E. For example, when the target application 1080 is only anative application on the mobile end, the security sandbox sub-system1090 may not comprise the sub-module 4310 for Web View type trafficdata. The scope of the present disclosure is not limited in this regard.

In some implementations, based on the type of the traffic data, thetraffic data may further be analyzed and restricted at the Socket layer.For example, the third-party SDK type traffic data may be forwarded atthe Socket layer, so that the third-party SDK type network request maybe directly analyzed. Alternatively, or in addition, the traffic data ofthe native type and the traffic data of the WebView type may be analyzedand restricted at the Socket layer.

In some implementations, a local server as a proxy may be built on thetarget application 1080. Network requests forwarded by the local serverto external servers may be managed by forwarding network requests of thetarget application 1080 to the local server and analyzing andrestricting traffic data at the local server. In this way, differenttypes of traffic data can be analyzed and restricted in consideration ofprotocol information to better manage traffic data of the applicationwhich will not be transmitted to unauthorized external servers.

Principles and details of the analysis and restriction of differenttypes of traffic data have been described in detail with reference toFIGS. 4B to 4E. It is to be understood that the above restriction rules,judgment logic and data exchange constraints are merely exemplary andnot intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. For example,different data sovereignty protection rules may be set according to lawsand regulations of different countries. In addition, depending on thedefinition of a computer network layer, traffic data may be analyzed andrestricted at layers close or similar to the above layers.

In addition, in the above description, the security sandbox sub-system1090 may directly analyze and restrict traffic data in the targetapplication 1080. In other words, only traffic data that is notrestricted by the security sandbox sub-system 1090 can be transmitted.Alternatively, or in addition, the security sandbox sub-system 1090 maynot directly restrict traffic data but only provide an analysis report.In this case, a copy of the network request can be sent to the securitysandbox system 1090 while the network request is normally transmitted.The security sandbox system 1090 can analyze the copy of the networkrequest and provide an analysis report.

In some implementations, regarding multiple data sovereignty countries,a plurality of security sandbox sub-systems 1090 may be set respectivelyto perform processing for each data sovereignty country, respectively.For example, based on a determination of a region where the target useris located, a corresponding security sandbox sub-system may be initiatedto analyze and restrict traffic data, so that transmission of user datain the application conforms to data sovereignty protection rules of thecorresponding country.

Recommendation Management Sub-System

As discussed above, the target application may provide users withvarious content recommendations through a recommendation mechanism, suchas multimedia content recommendation, user recommendation, commodityrecommendation, etc. In such applications, the fairness ofrecommendation policies has become the focus of management in manyregions. For example, some applications may use recommendationmechanisms to guide users to pay attention to specific content that hasnothing to do with user habits, and thus such recommendation mechanismsmight not be compliant.

On one hand, common recommendation algorithms often rely on machinelearning models for implementation. For example, the code-levelverification performed by the security computing subsystem 1060 might beunable to effectively detect the fairness of recommendation algorithms.On the other hand, the training and update of recommendation models areoften closely related to real user data, and people do not expect toexpose users' private data during the inspection process, because thismay lead to data compliance risks.

The embodiments of the present disclosure further propose a solution formanaging a recommendation policy. FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of a process500 for managing a recommendation policy. The process 500 may beperformed by the recommendation management sub-system 1050, for example.

As shown in FIG. 5, at block 502, the recommendation managementsub-system 1050 obtains a group of object features associated with agroup of objects in a target application, wherein the group of objectfeatures are converted based on attributes of the group of objects, thegroup of objects not directly expressing the attributes of the group ofobjects.

In some embodiments, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 mayobtain the group of object features via an application program interfaceAPI provided by the target application. In some embodiments, therecommendation management sub-system 1050 may obtain the group of objectfeatures associated with the group of objects in the target application1080 from the target application platform 1030 via a dedicated API.

In some embodiments, the group of object features may be converted by afeature extraction model based on attributes of the group of objects. Inthis way, the management party recommending the policy or other thirdparty cannot determine original attribute information of objects basedon the object features. Therefore, the data security in the targetapplication can be guaranteed.

At block 504, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 extracts afirst object feature and a second object feature from the group ofobject features, wherein a first difference between the first objectfeature and the second object feature is less than a first threshold.

In some embodiments, the group of object features may be represented asa plurality of vectors. Further, the recommendation managementsub-system 1050 may select at least one pair of object features whosedifference is less than the first threshold from the group of objectfeatures based on differences between vectors.

At block 506, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 determines afirst recommendation result corresponding to the first object featureand a second recommendation result corresponding to the second objectfeature based on a recommendation policy in the target application.

In some embodiments, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 mayprovide the first object feature to a recommendation model associatedwith the recommendation policy to determine the first recommendationresult and may provide the second object feature to the recommendationmodel to determine the second recommendation result.

In some embodiments, to guarantee the security of a recommended policy,the recommendation management sub-system 1050 sends the selected firstobject feature and second object feature via the API provided by thetarget application to a recommendation model that operates remotely todetermine the first recommendation result and the second recommendationresult. As an example, the recommendation model may be operated by themaintainer of the target application.

In some embodiments, the process of generating the first recommendationresult and the second recommendation result will not affect therecommendation model which is actually deployed in the targetapplication.

In some embodiments, the first recommendation result and the secondrecommendation result may be represented as vectors output by therecommendation model. Thereby, the recommendation management sub-system1050 cannot directly interpret the semantics of the first recommendationresult and the second recommendation result, thereby further improvingthe security of the data in the target application.

At block 508, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 evaluatesthe recommendation policy based on the first recommendation result andthe second recommendation result.

In some embodiments, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 maydetermine a second difference between the first recommendation resultand the second recommendation result and determine the fairness of therecommendation policy based on the comparison between the seconddifference and a second threshold.

Specifically, for a reasonable recommendation policy, the recommendationresults are supposed to be similar for two similar objects. Therefore,if the recommendation management sub-system 1050 determines that thesecond difference exceeds the second threshold, then it may determinethat the recommendation policy has poor fairness.

Or the recommendation management sub-system 1050 may also determine thefairness of the recommendation policy based on a proportion of theobject feature pairs whose second difference exceeds the secondthreshold. For example, the recommendation management sub-system 1050may randomly sample the plurality of groups of object features, and ifthe proportion of the object feature pairs whose second differenceexceeding the second threshold exceeds a threshold proportion, then itmay determine that the recommendation policy has poor fairness.

In some embodiments, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 mayfurther determine the fairness of the recommendation policy based on thecorrelation between object features input to the recommendation modeland historical recommendation results.

Specifically, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 may obtain athird object feature from the target application and a historicalrecommendation result for the third object feature. Further, therecommendation management sub-system 1050 determines the fairness of therecommendation policy based on the correlation between the third objectfeature and the historical recommendation result. For example, therecommendation management sub-system 1050 may determine whether theobject feature matches category information of the historicalrecommendation result.

In some embodiments, the recommendation management sub-system 1050 maydetermine vector representations corresponding to the third objectfeature and the historical recommendation result and determine thecorrelation between the third object feature and the historicalrecommendation result based on a difference between the two vectorrepresentations. For example, if the vector difference between an objectand its historical recommendation result is larger than a threshold,then the recommendation management sub-system 1050 may determine thatthe recommendation policy has poor fairness.

In some embodiments, as mentioned above, the security computingsub-system 1060 may further check source code associated with therecommendation policy. Specifically, the security computing sub-system1060 may obtain source code corresponding to the recommendation policyand evaluate the recommendation policy based on the source code orintermediate code corresponding to the source code.

In some embodiments, the recommendation policy may be used to recommendat least one multimedia content to a user in the target application1080, for example. Examples of the multimedia content may include: animage, video, music or combinations thereof, etc., for example.

Example Apparatus and Device

The embodiments of the present disclosure further provide a respectiveapparatus for performing the above method or process. FIG. 6 shows anexample block diagram of an apparatus 600 for data exchange according tosome embodiments of the present disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 6, the apparatus 600 comprises an obtaining module 610configured to obtain original data to be exchanged by a targetapplication between a first platform and a second platform. Theapparatus 600 further comprises a pre-processing module 620 configuredto obtain normalized data corresponding to a type of the original databy processing the original data based on the type. The apparatus 600further comprises a constraint satisfaction determining module 630configured to determine the satisfaction of a data exchange constraintfrom the normalized data.

In some embodiments, the first platform is a target application platformunder the jurisdiction of a specific country or region, and the secondplatform is a target application platform under the jurisdiction ofanother country or region.

In some embodiments, the apparatus 600 further comprises: a convertingmodule configured to: in accordance with a determination that thenormalized data satisfies the data exchange constraint, convert thenormalized data into the original data; and an interaction performingmodule configured to performing an exchange of the original data betweenthe first platform and the second platform.

In some embodiments, the type of the original data is selected from agroup comprising: message queue (MQ) type, offline aggregated data type,target object storage (TOS) type, and service invocation type.

In some embodiments, the pre-processing module 620 is configured to:detect a format of the original data, the type of the original datacomprising a plurality of formats; and obtain the normalized data byconverting the format of the original data into a specified format ofthe plurality of data formats through format conversion

In some embodiments, a plurality of data channels corresponding to aplurality of types of original data are created between the firstplatform and the second platform. In some embodiments, thepre-processing module 620 is configured to: select a data channelcorresponding to the type from the plurality of data channels based onthe type of the original data; and provide the original data to theselected data channel for processing.

In some embodiments, the data exchange constraint comprises aspecific-type of data exchange constraint associated with the type ofthe original data, the specific-type of data exchange constraint beingregistered in the selected data channel. In some embodiments, theconstraint satisfaction determining module 630 is configured todetermine, in the selected data channel, the satisfaction of thespecific-type data exchange constraint from the normalized data.

In some embodiments, the apparatus 600 further comprises: a channelestablishing module configured to create another data channelcorresponding to a new type of the original data between the firstplatform and the second platform if the new type of original data is tobe exchanged between the first platform and the second platform; and aconstraint registering module configured to register a specific-type ofdata exchange constraint associated with the new type in the other datachannel.

In some embodiments, the pre-processing module 620 is implemented in afirst data center, the constraint satisfaction determining module 630 isimplemented in a second data center, and the converting module isimplemented in a third data center. In some embodiments, the first datacenter does not have a direct communication connection with the thirddata center, and the first data center and the third data center have adirect communication connection with the second data centerrespectively.

In some embodiments, the first data center, the second data center andthe third data center are implemented by a virtual private data center(VPC) respectively.

FIG. 7 shows a schematic block diagram of an example device 700 forimplementing the embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, thesystem 100 and/or system 400 according to the embodiments of the presentdisclosure may be implemented by the device 700. As depicted, the device700 comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 701, which can executevarious suitable actions and processing based on the computer programinstructions stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 702 or computer programinstructions loaded in a random access memory (RAM) 703 from a storageunit 708. In the RAM 703, there are also stored various programs anddata required by the operation of the device 700. The CPU 701, the ROM702 and the RAM 703 are connected to one another via a bus 704. Aninput/output (I/O) interface 705 is also connected to the bus 704.

A plurality of components in the device 700 are connected to the I/Ointerface 705, including: an input unit 706 such as a keyboard, a mouseand the like; an output unit 707, such as various types of displays, aloudspeaker and the like; a storage unit 708, such as a disk, an opticaldisk and the like; and a communication unit 709, such as a network card,a modem, a wireless communication transceiver and the like. Thecommunication unit 709 allows the device 700 to exchangeinformation/data with other devices via the computer network, such asthe Internet, and/or various telecommunication networks.

The above-described procedures and processes, such as the process 500,may be executed by the processing unit 701. For example, in someembodiments, the process 500 may be implemented as a computer softwareprogram, which is tangibly included in a machine readable medium, e.g.the storage unit 708. In some embodiments, the computer program may bepartially or fully loaded and/or mounted to the device 700 via the ROM702 and/or the communication unit 709. The computer program, when loadedto the RAM 703 and executed by the CPU 701, may execute one or moreactions of the process 500 as described above.

The present disclosure may be method, apparatus, system, and/or computerprogram product. The computer program product may comprise acomputer-readable storage medium on which the computer-readable programinstructions for executing various aspects of the present disclosure areloaded.

The computer-readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canmaintain and store instructions utilized by an instruction executingdevice. The computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, butnot limited to, such as an electronic storage device, a magnetic storagedevice, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. More concrete examples of the computer-readable storagemedium (non-exhaustive list) include: a portable computer diskette, ahard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), anerasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a staticrandom access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory(CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk,a mechanically encoding device such as punch-cards stored withinstructions thereon or a projection in a slot, and any suitablecombination of the above. The computer-readable storage medium, as usedherein, is not to be interpreted as transient signals per se, such asradio waves or other freely propagated electromagnetic waves,electromagnetic waves propagated through a waveguide or othertransmission media (e.g., optical pulses via fiber-optic cables), orelectric signals transmitted through wires.

The computer-readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded from the computer-readable storage medium to eachcomputing/processing device, or to an external computer or externalstorage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local areanetwork, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network maycomprise copper transmitted cables, optical transmission fibers,wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, network gatecomputers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or networkinterface in each computing/processing device receives computer-readableprogram instructions from the network and forwards the computer-readableprogram instructions for storage in the computer-readable storage mediumof each computing/processing device.

Computer-readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present disclosure may be assembly instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like,and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. Thecomputer-readable program instructions may execute entirely on theuser's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alonesoftware package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remotecomputer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latterscenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computerthrough any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or awide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an externalcomputer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet ServiceProvider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, forexample, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays(FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute thecomputer-readable program instructions by utilizing state information ofthe computer-readable program instructions to personalize the electroniccircuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present disclosure.

Aspects of the present disclosure are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It is to be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer-readable program instructions.

These computer-readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer-readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that thecomputer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereincomprises an article of manufacture including instructions whichimplement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/orblock diagram block or blocks.

The computer-readable program instructions may also be loaded into acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatuses, or otherdevices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on thecomputer, other programmable apparatuses or other devices to produce acomputer implemented process, such that the instructions which executeon the computer, other programmable apparatuses, or other devicesimplement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof code, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be notedthat, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in theblock may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, twoblocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantiallyconcurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverseorder, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be notedthat each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, andcombinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchartillustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-basedsystems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations ofspecial purpose hardware and computer instructions.

The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosurehave been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intendedto be exhaustive or limited to embodiments disclosed. Many modificationsand variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the artwithout departing from the scope and spirit of the describedembodiments. The selection of terms used herein was chosen to bestexplain the principles of embodiments, the practical application ortechnical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or toenable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand embodimentsdisclosed herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for data exchange, comprising: obtainingoriginal data to be exchanged by a target application between a firstplatform and a second platform; obtaining normalized data correspondingto a type of the original data by processing the original data based onthe type, wherein a plurality of data channels corresponding to aplurality of types of original data are created between the firstplatform and the second platform, and processing the original datacomprises: selecting a data channel corresponding to the type from theplurality of data channels based on the type of the original data, andproviding the original data to the selected data channel for processing;and determining a satisfaction of a data exchange constraint from thenormalized data, wherein the data exchange constraint comprises aspecific-type of data exchange constraint associated with the type ofthe original data, the specific-type of data exchange constraint beingregistered in the selected data channel.
 2. The method according toclaim 1, wherein the first platform is a target application platformunder jurisdiction of a specific country or region, and the secondplatform is a target application platform under jurisdiction of anothercountry or region.
 3. The method according to claim 1, furthercomprising: in accordance with a determination that the normalized datasatisfies the data exchange constraint, converting the normalized datainto the original data; and performing an exchange of the original databetween the first platform and the second platform.
 4. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein the type of the original data is selectedfrom a group comprising: a message queue (MQ) type, an offlineaggregated data type, a target object storage (TOS) type, and a serviceinvocation type.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein processingthe original data comprises: detecting a format of the original data,the type of the original data comprising a plurality of formats; andobtaining the normalized data by converting the format of the originaldata into a specified format of the plurality of data formats throughformat conversion.
 6. The method according to claim 1, whereindetermining the satisfaction of the data exchange constraint comprises:determining, in the selected data channel, the satisfaction of thespecific-type of data exchange constraint from the normalized data. 7.The method according to claim 1, further comprising: creating anotherdata channel corresponding to a new type of the original data betweenthe first platform and the second platform if the new type of originaldata is to be exchanged between the first platform and the secondplatform; and registering a specific-type of data exchange constraintassociated with the new type in the other data channel.
 8. The methodaccording to claim 3, wherein the processing of the original data isperformed in a first data center, the determination of the satisfactionof the data exchange constraint is performed in a second data center,and the conversion from the normalized data to the original data isperformed in a third data center, wherein the first data center does nothave a direct communication connection with the third data center, andthe first data center and the third data center have a directcommunication connection with the second data center respectively. 9.The method according to claim 8, wherein the first data center, thesecond data center and the third data center are implemented by avirtual private data center (VPC) respectively.
 10. A data exchangesystem, comprising: a first data center, configured to obtain originaldata to be exchanged between a first platform of a target applicationand an outside second platform, and obtain normalized data correspondingto a type of the original data by processing the original data based onthe type, wherein the data exchange system is divided into a pluralityof data channels corresponding to a plurality of types of datarespectively, a respective type of data being exchanged in each datachannel, and wherein the first data center is configured to process theoriginal data by selecting a data channel corresponding to the type fromthe plurality of data channels based on the type of the original data,and providing the original data to the selected data channel forprocessing; and a second data center, configured to obtain thenormalized data from the first data center and determine a satisfactionof a data exchange constraint based on the normalized data, wherein thedata exchange constraint comprises a specific-type of data exchangeconstraint associated with the type of the original data, thespecific-type of data exchange constraint being registered in theselected data channel.
 11. The data exchange system according to claim10, further comprising a third data center: wherein if the second datacenter determines that the normalized data satisfies the data exchangeconstraint, providing the normalized data to the third data center,wherein the third data center is configured to convert the normalizeddata into the original data; and perform an exchange of the originaldata between the first platform and the second platform.
 12. The dataexchange system according to claim 11, wherein the first data centerdoes not have a direct communication connection with the third datacenter, and the first data center and the third data center have adirect communication connection with the second data center,respectively.
 13. The data exchange system according to claim 11,wherein the first data center, the second data center and the third datacenter are implemented by a virtual private data center (VPC)respectively.
 14. A computer-readable storage medium, with one or morecomputer instructions stored thereon, wherein the one or more computerinstructions are executed by a processor to: obtain original data to beexchanged by a target application between a first platform and a secondplatform; obtain normalized data corresponding to a type of the originaldata by processing the original data based on the type, wherein aplurality of data channels corresponding to a plurality of types oforiginal data are created between the first platform and the secondplatform, and processing the original data includes: selecting a datachannel corresponding to the type from the plurality of data channelsbased on the type of the original data; and providing the original datato the selected data channel for processing; and determine asatisfaction of a data exchange constraint from the normalized data,wherein the data exchange constraint comprises a specific-type of dataexchange constraint associated with the type of the original data, thespecific-type of data exchange constraint being registered in theselected data channel.